BBN3402 MINGGU 10
SITI ZAHIRIAH BINTI RASHID
197689
GARLIC
BREAD
You won’t find me turning my nose up at
even the most unreconstructed, baguette-bound garlic bread, but I happen to be
particularly besotted with this version, made cross-culturally, with small,
puffy-tummied, spindle-tipped Indian breads to form almost gondola-shaped
individual loaves for greedy people.
The
stipulation of unsalted butter followed by the addition of salt is not as mad
as it seems: unsalted butter just has a better taste; and nothing gives a more
desirable saltiness than Maldon sea salt (and no, I am not on the payroll) or
another sea salt.
3/4 cup unsalted butter sprinkling of Maldon or other
sea salt
4 cloves garlic, minced, preferably by microplane 2
Barbari nans or other small bread loaves
Mix the butter and garlic with some
salt you can do this in the food
processor if that helps----- and slash the Barbari nans at angles; about 4 cuts
per little loaf should be about right. Spread the butter generously into the
cuts you have made, then wrap the nans in foil and put them on a baking sheet.
When
you are ready---- and you can sit them thus prepared for hours if you
want-----preheat the oven to 400°¬ F, and cook the foil-wrapped breads for
about 15 minutes, then open the foil loosely and let the breads crisp up a bit
on the top for about 5 minutes before you take them out of the oven.
Give
each person their own, semi-unwrapped loaf, still in its foil. Children, who
seem to love both garlic bread and individually portioned food (sharing not
being a strong point with them) tend to be mad about these------ or mine are
(at time of going to press at least).
Serves
2.
ROTI
BAWANG PUTIH
Anda tidak akan mendapati saya
menghidupkan hidung saya walaupun roti bawang putih yang paling tidak
dibungkus, baguette, tetapi saya kebiasaannya bersesuaian dengan versi ini,
dibuat bersilang kultur, dengan roti India yang kecil, bengkak-bungkil,
berputar-putar untuk membentuk roti individu berbentuk gondola untuk orang
tamak.
Penggunaan
mentega tanpa garam tambahan yang diikuti dengan penambahan garam kelihatan
tidak begitu janggal: mentega tanpa garam tambahan mempunyai rasa yang lebih
baik; dan tidak ada yang memberikan rasa masam yang lebih baik daripada garam
laut Maldon (dan tidak, saya tidak di senarai gaji) atau garam laut lain.
3/4 cawan mentega tanpa garam tambahan Maldon atau garam
laut lain
4 ulas bawang putih, sebaik-baiknya dicincang 2 Barbari nans atau roti roti kecil lain
Campurkan mentega dan bawang putih
dengan beberapa cubit garam yang boleh anda lakukan dalam pemprosesan makanan
jika itu membantu ----- dan bahagikan Barbari nans pada sudut; kira-kira 4
potong setiap roti kecil sepatutnya betul. Sapukan mentega dengan murah hati
kepada potongan yang telah anda buat, kemudian balutkan nans dalam foil dan
letakkan di atas lembaran penaik.
Apabila anda sudah siap ---- dan anda
boleh duduk bersiap sedia selama sejam jika anda mahu ----- panaskan ketuhar
hingga 400° F, dan masak roti yang dibungkus foil selama kira-kira 15 minit,
kemudian buka foil longgar dan biarkan roti segar sedikit di atas selama
kira-kira 5 minit sebelum anda mengeluarkannya dari oven.
Beri setiap orang roti mereka sendiri,
separuh yang masih kosong, masih dalam kerajangnya. Kanak-kanak, yang suka suka
roti bawang putih dan makanan secara berasingan (berkongsi tidak menjadi titik
kuat dengan mereka) akan membuatkan mereka marah tentang ini - atau saya adalah
(pada masa akan menekan sekurang-kurangnya).
Penyediaan ke 2.
TERJEMAHAN KERANGKA TEORI (THEORY FRAMEWORKS
TRANSLATION)
BROWN
& YULE THEORY OF THE ANALYSIS (1983)
Brown & Yule (1983) has listed four
elements of discourse. The elements include pre-assumptions, implications,
references and inferences. Brown & Yule (1983) also stated that discourse
can be analysed through text, writing, speech and interaction studies.
Pre-assumptions
Predictions are pragmatic. These
assumptions have been selected based on assumptions and assumptions about what
the listener can expect without any obstacles.
Implications
Implicit is the view or the
possibility. The suggestions or meanings of the speakers / writers are
different from what they say. Concepts are conventional applications. Speakers
/ authors do not state that certain images are due to other features.
References
Speakers negotiate using appropriate
expressions and combine them with negotiation expressions. Referrals are
something that someone does using expressions.
Inference
The inference indicates an attempt to
draw conclusions. In addition, inference describes words or relationships
between words. Various assumptions have been made in several assumptions and
conclusions.
DISCOURSE
ANALYSIS THEORY BY STUBBS (1983)
Stubbs's
theory (1983) focuses on the linguistic discourse.
1.
The linguistic approach to discourse
2.
Predictability
3.
Phonetic
4.
Grammar
5.
Intuition of discourse arrangement
6.
Predictability
7.
Predictability and idealization
8.
Structure control means
9.
Canonical discourse and idealization
10.
Analogy
11.
Conclusion
CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS THEORY
(VANDIJK, 1977)
Macro
Structure
The global meaning of an observable
text
From the topic / theme of
a text
Superstructure
The outline of a text such as the
introduction,
Contents, conclusions and
conclusions
Micro
Structure
The local meaning of an observable
text
Instead of the choice of
words, sentences and styles used in a text
Figure
1: Theory of Critical Discourse Analysis by vanDijk (1977)
CRITICAL
DISCOURSE ANALYSIS THEORY BY FAIRCLOUGH (1995)
Theory of Critical discourse analysis (Fairclough, 1995)
Textual Analysis Practical Discourse Analysis Social Practical Analysis
Grammar Inter-technical Economy
• Themes • Pre-assumption Education
Lexical • Metawacana Political
• Metaphor • Disclaimer
• Narratives
Cohesion Inter-discussion
• Repetition • Narrative
• Conjunctions • Debate
• Expository
• Expressive
Figure 2: Critical
Discourse Analysis Theory by Fairclough (1995)
Tannen's (1987) principles of decency
in discourse are as follows:
1. Formal expressions (positive and
negative images)
2. Communication strategies
3. Strategic choices (directness and
indirectness)
4. Silence (metamessage)
STRATEGY OF COURTESY BY BROWN &
LEVINSON (1987)
STRATEGY OF
COURTESY
|
|
Bald on-record
Example:
Ready!
Listen here…
Give me that big basket.
The light is in green
colour.
Come in.
Enjoy the meal.
|
Positive courtesy
Example: you seems
unhappy. May I help you?
May I borrow hundred
dollars?
I’ll follow you to the
hospital, if you don’t mind.
|
Negative courtesy
Maybe he is the one who
taken that box, maybe!
Please give me that white
plate.
If that, no instruction
needed even a bit?
Throw away empty bottles
are not allowed.
|
Off-record
Wow, this room is very cold.
The price of shoes here very expensive.
Your dress is nice
|
Figure 3 : Strategy of Decency by Brown
& Levinson (1987)
Johnstone (2002) said that the discourse
approaches are divided into several sections.
1. Words and lines
2. Paragraphs and episodes
3. Schematic discourse and narrative
structure
4. Conversations arrangement
5. Sentences organization
6. Cohesion
7. Structures and rules
NORMALIZA ABD RAHIM (2018B) DISCOURSE
ANALYSIS APPROACHES
Discourse
Analysis Approaches
(Normaliza Abd
Rahim, 2018b)
|
||||
PRE-ASSUMPTIONS
1. Intuition
2. Contexts
·
Acceptance
/
disclaimer
·
Requirements
·
References
·
Anaphor
·
Repetition
·
Ambiguity
·
Affirmation
|
EMOTIONS
1. Positive
2. Negative
3. Mixed emotions
·
Temperament
·
Personality
·
Mood
·
Motivation
|
VALUES AND
CULTURES
1. Self
2. Community
3. Custom
·
Honest,
sincere, kind-hearted, love, hardworking, thanksgiving, simplicity
·
Self-reliance,
high self-esteem, courage, physical and mental hygiene, decency
·
Respect,
teamwork, community spiritual
·
Justice,
freedom, rationality
|
LANGUAGES
1. First / second / third languages
2. Formal / informal
3. Language errors
4. Linguistics
|
INFERENCES
1. Overall summary
2. Discussion topic summary
3. Closing words
|
Figure 4: Normaliza Abd Rahim (2018b)
Discourse Analysis Approaches
DISCOURSE ANALYSIS THEORY
Discourse
Analysis Theory (Normaliza Abd Rahim, 2018d)
|
||
Contents
1. Theme
|
Contexts
1. Grammar
2. Background
3. Emotion
|
Assumptions
1.
Opinions
2.
References
3.
Questions
|
Figure 5: Discourse Analysis Theory
No comments:
Post a Comment